Shampoo caused cancer…
July 16th, 2010 | by jys |FL bought a new shampoo at Jusco 2 months ago and after using it, he found it quite good. When he almost finished the first bottle, he decided to get another bottle, a bigger one. Just before he starts using the second bottle, the news came out and mentioned that that shampoo contained dioxane (二恶烷) which can caused cancer.
Besides the brand FL’s using, the website also posted some other popular brands (which we can easily find at all major supermarkets) contained dioxane too. Of cos, all these news were in the China/HK websites, I wonder our country started to look into it already or not? Or just as usual, tell us that that product in other countries got problem, but the same product in our country got no problem?
Anyway, back to the topic. What I’m trying to say here is that, why every time, after a product launched in the market for SO MANY years then only they realized it’s harmful to us? Can you imagine, it might be 10 yrs, or 20 or 30 yrs we’ve already used that product, then suddenly u tell us it’s not good for our health, what will happened to us? I guess that’s why so many ppl diagnosed with cancer nowadays, the food we eating, the product we using, all caused cancer..
Since now they said most shampoo in the market also contained dioxane, maybe we should start using soap powder to wash our hair? or better still don’t wash hair at all?

5 Responses to “Shampoo caused cancer…”
By k0k on Jul 16, 2010 | Reply
wait, what shampoo is this?! how can u not warn us all?!!!!
Jys:
well, can’t tell yet cos they are submitting the result for 2nd test.. hehe… The one FL using starts with “B”, a china brand, which got the famous star face (“JC”) on the box, then the other brand that most major store got sell starts with “P”. I’m sure you’re able to guess wat’s the brand name lar…
By vialentino on Jul 16, 2010 | Reply
wah shit…din know this and hope this is not true at all
Jys:
~sigh.. who knows? this minute the product is released in the market, the next minute said can caused cancer? then the next next minute said the amount used is not sufficient to caused cancer?
By ken on Jul 16, 2010 | Reply
maybe it’s one of the component that cause cancer.. but light usage will be fine? =/
Jys:
i dono, but after use for 10 yrs.. light usage also become heavy usage? hehe…
ken´s last [type] ~ July Contest- Win an Apple iPod Shuffle
By Katrina on Nov 14, 2011 | Reply
Yes it is really confusing. Why now? Why not on before placing it in market a study should be made thoroughly. Imagine this, those inspectors are quite few for those many products being endorsed everyday from multiple companies who manufactures products all year round.
Katrina´s last [type] ~ hair loss shampoo
By jys on Dec 1, 2011 | Reply
Yes Katrina, totally agreed with u. Proper testing should be done before even selling it in the market!